Important Change to our 30-day Money Back Guarantee ************************************** Due to the increasing allegations of fraudulent purchase transactions involving documents specifically designated for the purposes of litigation in eviction and/or unlawful detainer proceedings, we have been forced into choosing whether to continue offering such documents at all to ANYONE, or to declare that they are NON-REFUNDABLE, and are no longer covered by the 30-day money-back guarantee. ************************************** Consequently we have decided that as of March 16, 2024 at 1:00 am, PDT any single document specifically listed in the Eviction Defense Collection is hereby NON-REFUNDABLE. To determine if one or more of your proposed documents are NON-REFUNDABLE you will need to review the list of single documents found within the description for the Eviction Defense Collection. ************************************** In the meantime, we will be updating the individual file listings for all such affected documents. ************************************** HOWEVER, YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED!

Defenses to an eviction after foreclosure in California

by Stan Burman

Defenses to an eviction after foreclosure in California are the topic of this blog post.

This post will specifically discuss the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1161b.

Due to the bursting of the housing bubble many properties went into foreclosure all over the United States, California was particularly hard hit.  California tenants that were renting properties that had been foreclosed on were discovering that the property they had been renting and living in had been foreclosed on and they were expected to move out very quickly.

The general rule in California as well as many other states at that time was that after the foreclosure sale any lease that had been entered into between the previous owner and another person was extinguished. Eviction proceedings could be commenced very soon after the foreclosure sale.

However the California Legislature amended the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1161b that became effective on January 1, 2013. This was done to ensure that California law was comparable to Federal law, namely the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act which expired on December 31, 2014.

Tenants in California who signed a lease with the previous owner of a property that has been foreclosed on now have the right under this new law in most cases to remain in the property until the remaining term of their lease as long as they comply with the terms of the lease. And even tenants who do not have a lease with the previous owner are still entitled to a 90 day notice to vacate if they are considered a bona-fide tenant under the law.

Code of Civil Procedure § 1161b states that,

“(a) Notwithstanding Section 1161a, a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit under a month-to-month lease or periodic tenancy at the time the property is sold in foreclosure shall be given 90 days’ written notice to quit pursuant to Section 1162 before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property as prescribed in this chapter.

(b) In addition to the rights set forth in subdivision (a), tenants or subtenants holding possession of a rental housing unit under a fixed-term residential lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale shall have the right to possession until the end of the lease term, and all rights and obligations under the lease shall survive foreclosure, except that the tenancy may be terminated upon 90 days’ written notice to quit pursuant to subdivision (a) if any of the following conditions apply:

(1) The purchaser or successor in interest will occupy the housing unit as a primary residence.

(2) The lessee is the mortgagor or the child, spouse, or parent of the mortgagor.

(3) The lease was not the result of an arms’ length transaction.

(4) The lease requires the receipt of rent that is substantially less than fair market rent for the property, except when rent is reduced or subsidized due to a federal, state, or local subsidy or law.

(c) The purchaser or successor in interest shall bear the burden of proof in establishing that a fixed-term residential lease is not entitled to protection under subdivision (b).

(d) This section shall not apply if any party to the note remains in the property as a tenant, subtenant, or occupant.

(e) Nothing in this section is intended to affect any local just cause eviction ordinance. This section does not, and shall not be construed to, affect the authority of a public entity that otherwise exists to regulate or monitor the basis for eviction.

(f) This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2019, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before December 31, 2019, deletes or extends that date.”

Tenants who have entered into a lease with the previous owner before the notice of foreclosure have the right to remain until the end of their lease.  Note that Code of Civil Procedure section 1161b does not apply if the former owners remain in the property. Another exception is situations where the purchaser at the foreclosure sale intends to occupy the property as a primary residence, and even then a 90-day notice must be given.

However, the law provides a tenant must meet certain conditions to be considered a bona-fide tenant. For instance, neither the previous owner or his spouse or child are bona-fide tenants, the lease must be the result of an arms-length transaction, and the rental amount must not be substantially less than fair market rent for the property, unless the rent is reduced or subsidized due to a Federal, State or local subsidy.

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a 13 page sample answer to an unlawful detainer complaint that contains 15 affirmative defenses, including the affirmative defense that the tenant is entitled to possession of the premises under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1161b sold by the author can use the link shown below.

Sample Answer to Unlawful Detainer (Eviction) Complaint for California by Stan Burman on Scribd

 

Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California unlawful detainer (eviction) document package containing over 30 sample documents including the sample answer to an eviction complaint shown above and sold by the author can use the link shown below.

https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products/california-eviction-litigation-document-collection

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.  

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

 

Back to Blog from LegalDocsPro