Header October 3, 2024 ************************************** ************************************** Effective immediately the document collections will no longer be available via the online store. We apologize for any inconvenience, but circumstances have changed to the extent that we must do this in order to protect our business operations. ************************************** ************************************** We have found another way of meeting your needs for any of the following collections. ************************************** ************************************** California discovery document collection, California divorce document collection, California Eviction Defense Document Collection, California judgment recovery document collection, California law and motion document collection, California Legal (formerly Super) Document Collection, Federal legal document collection, Platinum sample legal document collection ************************************** ************************************** Please contact us if you have a need for one or more of these document collections. You can purchase these collections directly from us by contacting us at burman-enterprises@sbcglobal.net. ************************************** ************************************** Important changes have been made to our 30-day Money Back Guarantee. Please review or Refund Policy. ************************************** ************************************** Here are two one-time use codes that you may use to save on your next document purchases from us from now until 12a PT, on Dec 11, 2024. ************************************** Save 25% off any purchase of $95 or more to qualify with this code, YSDSWEWAQV0Y. ************************************** And, Save 20% off any purchase with no minimum requirement to qualify with this code, G4Y686CX74HP. ************************************** Yes, you may use both discount codes, but they must be on separate orders. ************************************** **************************************

New trial motion in United States District Court

by Stan Burman

A new trial motion in United States District Court is the topic of this blog post. 

A new trial motion in United States District Court is filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(a) which authorizes the filing of a motion for a new trial on some or all of the issues for civil cases in United States District Court.

A new trial motion in Federal Court can only be filed using certain grounds and must be filed within 28 calendar days after the judgment is entered.  However in situations where the stakes are high enough filing a motion for new trial can be very useful. Another advantage is that a timely-filed new trial motion extends the time to file a notice of appeal under the provisions of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) until the entry of the order disposing of the motion for new trial.

The main grounds for a motion for new trial under Rule 59(a) after a jury trial are (1) the verdict is against the weight of the evidence; (2) newly discovered evidence: (3) prejudicial conduct by the court or opposing counsel, and (4) juror misconduct although other grounds might apply in certain situations.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) states that,
   
“(a) In General.
   
(1) Grounds for New Trial. The court may, on motion, grant a new trial on all or some of the issues—and to any party—as follows:
   
(A) after a jury trial, for any reason for which a new trial has heretofore been granted in an action at law in federal court; or
   
(B) after a nonjury trial, for any reason for which a rehearing has heretofore been granted in a suit in equity in federal court.
   
(2) Further Action After a Nonjury Trial. After a nonjury trial, the court may, on motion for a new trial, open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new ones, and direct the entry of a new judgment.”
   
Rule 59(b) states that, ”(b) Time to File a Motion for a New Trial. A motion for a new trial must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment.”
   
However because each individual case is unique a party may actually have more than 28 calendar days to file the motion for new trial as in order to start the clock running on the 28 day deadline requires a final judgment requiring a separate document under Rule 58(a) which is considered entered when the judgment is both entered in the civil docket under Rule 79(a) and either (a) it is set forth on a separate document or (b) 150 days have run from entry of the judgment in the civil docket, whichever occurs first. See Rule 58(c)(2).
   
The moving party must meet their burden of showing sufficient facts and evidence to support their grounds and must show that a miscarriage of justice will result if the judgment is not vacated and a new trial granted.
   
For example a party requesting a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence has the burden of convincing the judge that the verdict is against the clear weight of the evidence or is based on evidence which is false or will result in a miscarriage of justice.
   
Parties requesting a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence must show that the evidence in question was discovered after the date of the trial; that the moving party exercised due diligence to discover the evidence before the end of the trial; the evidence is material and not merely cumulative or impeaching; and the new evidence would likely have changed the outcome of the case.
   
A party requesting a new trial on the grounds of prejudicial conduct by the judge or opposing counsel must show that they were so severely prejudiced that they were prevented from having a fair trial.  For example it is improper for a judgment to comment on any ultimate factual issues such as the issue of which party was negligent, which party breached the contract, etc. And a new trial can be ordered in cases where the opposing counsel committed misconduct at the trial that made it reasonably certain that the verdict was influence by the prejudicial statements.  An opening or closing statement incorrectly expands any potential grounds of liability or takes away any benefit the aggrieved party may have won a prior motion such as a motion for partial summary judgment, violating an in limine order or the Federal Rules of Evidence.

The party requesting a new trial on the grounds of juror misconduct must show that the juror misconduct resulted in them suffering prejudice which could include extraneous information obtained by a juror from friends or relatives or a juror introducing facts or evidence acquired outside of the courtroom during jury deliberations.
   
Attorneys or parties that would like to view a portion of a 16 page sample motion for new trial in United States District Court containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service by mail can use the link shown below.

Sample Motion for New Trial Under Rule 59(a) by Stan Burman on Scribd

 

Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a Federal legal document collection containing over 50 sample documents including a sample motion for a new trial sold by the author can use the link shown below.

https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/collections/frontpage/products/federal-legal-document-collection 

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.  

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

 

Back to Blog from LegalDocsPro