Request for reconsideration in California

A request for reconsideration in California is the topic of this blog post.

A request for reconsideration in California is authorized by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a).
 
A request for reconsideration of a ruling on a motion is very useful, but only if you are aware of the requirements imposed on a motion for reconsideration in California.

The first and most important requirement on a motion for reconsideration is the 10 day time limit.  The law in California requires any statutory motion for reconsideration to be filed within 10 days after service on the party of written notice of entry of the order. The second requirement is that the party moving for reconsideration of an order must make a showing of new or different facts, circumstances or law since the date of the original order that the moving party was not aware of and could not have discovered with reasonable diligence.

Code of Civil Procedure § 1008(a) states that “When an application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. The party making the application shall state by affidavit what application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown.”

Several decisions of the California Courts of Appeal have stated that a decision on a motion is not res judicata, and a trial court has jurisdiction to reconsider a prior ruling.

And several decisions of the California Courts of Appeal have held that a demurrer is an application for an order within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1008(a) and will support an application to reconsider an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.

A motion for reconsideration is only applicable to interim orders, not final orders.  Note that any party affected by an order may file a motion as reconsideration is not limited to the party who filed the original application for an order.

Attorneys and parties in California who would like to view a portion of a sample motion for reconsideration that contains a memorandum of points and authorities, sample declaration and  proof of service by mail that is sold by the author can use the link shown below.

Sample motion for reconsideration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a) in California by Stan Burman on Scribd

 

Attorneys or parties in California who would like more information on a law and motion document collection containing over 70 sample documents for California litigation including a sample motion for reconsideration sold by the author can use the link shown below.

https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products/california-law-and-motion-document-collection

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.  

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.