Header October 3, 2024 ************************************** ************************************** Effective immediately the document collections will no longer be available via the online store. We apologize for any inconvenience, but circumstances have changed to the extent that we must do this in order to protect our business operations. ************************************** ************************************** We have found another way of meeting your needs for any of the following collections. ************************************** ************************************** California discovery document collection, California divorce document collection, California Eviction Defense Document Collection, California judgment recovery document collection, California law and motion document collection, California Legal (formerly Super) Document Collection, Federal legal document collection, Platinum sample legal document collection ************************************** ************************************** Please contact us if you have a need for one or more of these document collections. You can purchase these collections directly from us by contacting us at burman-enterprises@sbcglobal.net. ************************************** ************************************** Important changes have been made to our 30-day Money Back Guarantee. Please review or Refund Policy. ************************************** ************************************** Here are two one-time use codes that you may use to save on your next document purchases from us from now until 12a PT, on Dec 11, 2024. ************************************** Save 25% off any purchase of $95 or more to qualify with this code, YSDSWEWAQV0Y. ************************************** And, Save 20% off any purchase with no minimum requirement to qualify with this code, G4Y686CX74HP. ************************************** Yes, you may use both discount codes, but they must be on separate orders. ************************************** **************************************

Vacating a default in United States District Court

by Stan Burman

Vacating a default in United States District Court is the topic of this blog post.

Vacating a default in United States District Court is required by a defendant when the clerk has entered a default, but no judgment has been entered yet.

Vacating a default in United States District Court requires that a motion to vacate the default be filed under Rule 55(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which states that,

“The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause, and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b).”

Vacating a default in United States District Court is easier than vacating a default judgment under Rule 60(b) as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated in a published case that the standard of good cause for vacating an entry of default is the same as that for setting aside a default judgment under Rule 60(b), but the test for setting aside entry of default is less rigid and is more generous to the party in default.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has also stated in another published case that there are three factors to be considered by the Court when deciding whether to set aside a default: (1) whether the defendant’s culpable conduct led to the default; (2) whether the defendant has a meritorious defense; and (3) whether setting aside default would prejudice the plaintiff, and that the law does not favor defaults and any doubts should be decided in favor of the defaulting party.

In discussing the first factor of culpable conduct, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated in a published case that even a negligent failure to respond may be excusable if the defaulting party offers a credible, good-faith explanation for the delay that does not show any intention to take advantage of the opposing party, interfere with judicial decision-making, or otherwise manipulate the legal process.

As for the second factor of a meritorious defense, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated in a published case that a defense is considered meritorious if there is some possibility that the outcome of the suit after a full trial will be contrary to the result achieved by the default.

In discussing the third factor of prejudice to the plaintiff if the default is set aside the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated in published cases that prejudice is determined by whether a party will be hindered in pursuing its claim, and that the fact that a party may be denied a quick victory is not sufficient to deny relief from default judgment.  Prejudice requires tangible harm such as loss of evidence, increased difficulties of discovery, or greater opportunity for fraud or collusion.

Sample motion for order vacating a default in United States District Court for sale.

Attorneys or parties that would like to view a portion of a sample 10 page motion for an order vacating a default in United States District Court under Rule 55(c) containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service sold by the author can use the link shown below.

Sample Motion to Vacate Default Under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court by Stan Burman on Scribd

Over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation for sale.

To view more information on over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation visit: https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.

Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/  for more information.

Follow Stan Burman on Twitter at:

https://twitter.com/legaldocspro

Follow Stan Burman on Google Plus at:

https://plus.google.com/+StanBurman

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

 

Back to Blog from LegalDocsPro