A renewal of a motion in a divorce case in California is the topic of this blog post.
A renewal of a motion in a divorce case in California is authorized pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(b) and has one very important advantage compared to a motion for reconsideration in that it is not subject to the 10 day statutory time limitation that imposed on motions for reconsideration. The major disadvantage to renewing a motion is that they can ONLY by brought by the party who filed the original motion.
Code of Civil Procedure § 1008(b) states in pertinent part that “A party who originally made an application for an order which was refused in whole or part, or granted conditionally or on terms, may make a subsequent application for the same order upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, in which case it shall be shown by affidavit what application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown.”
A request to renew a motion may be filed in a divorce, legal separation or nullity case in California under the provisions of Family Code § 210 which states that, “Except to the extent that any other statute or rules adopted by the Judicial Council provide applicable rules, the rules of practice and procedure applicable to civil actions generally, including the provisions of Title 3a (commencing with Section 391) of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, apply to, and constitute the rules of practice and procedure in, proceedings under this code.”
Certain requirements must be met in order to successfully renew a motion in a divorce case in California. The party seeking to renew the motion must make a showing of new or different facts, circumstances or law since the date of the original order that the moving party was not aware of and could not have discovered with reasonable diligence. If they fail to comply with the statutory provisions their motion will most likely be denied.
The California Courts of Appeal have stated in several decisions that a ruling on a motion is not res judicata, and a trial court has jurisdiction to consider a renewal of a previous motion.
Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a 10 page sample renewal of a motion in a divorce case in California sold by the author that contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, a sample declaration and proof of service can use the link shown below.
Sample Renewal of Motion for California Divorce by Stan Burman on Scribd
Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California divorce document collection containing over 45 sample documents including a renewal of motion in a divorce case in California sold by the author can use the link shown below.
Over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation for sale.
To view more information on over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation visit: https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.
Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.
Follow Stan Burman on Twitter at:
https://twitter.com/legaldocspro
Follow Stan Burman on Google Plus at:
https://plus.google.com/+StanBurman
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.